Researchers say orangutans are declining, despite Indonesian government’s claims

first_imgResearchers say a recent Indonesian government report inaccurately claims that the orangutan population in the country is increasing, which could have significant implications for future conservation plans.The report, issued by Indonesia’s Ministry of Environment and Forestry, states that the populations of 19 priority species, including orangutans, “increased by more than 10 percent” between 2015 and 2017.But, in a letter published in the journal Current Biology on Monday, researchers say that that assertion “is in strong contrast” to many recently published and peer-reviewed scientific studies on the status of the three orangutan species. Researchers say a recent Indonesian government report inaccurately claims that the orangutan population in the country is increasing, which could have significant implications for future conservation plans.The report, issued by Indonesia’s Ministry of Environment and Forestry with support from the UN’s Food and Agricultural Organization and Norway’s International Climate and Forest Initiative, states that the populations of 19 priority species, including orangutans, “increased by more than 10 percent” between 2015 and 2017.But, in a letter published in the journal Current Biology on Monday, researchers say that that assertion “is in strong contrast” to many recently published and peer-reviewed scientific studies on the status of the three orangutan species: the Bornean orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus), the Sumatran orangutan (Pongo abelii), and the Tapanuli orangutan (Pongo tapanuliensis), which was just confirmed as a separate species last year. All three species are listed as Critically Endangered on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.According to Erik Meijaard, who coordinates the Borneo Futures initiative and is the lead author of the letter, orangutan numbers are in decline, not increasing as the Indonesian government report contends.“The government monitoring data do indeed support such an increase, so that would justify the government’s claim. But, as we point out, the monitoring methods are flawed for a variety of reasons,” Meijaard told Mongabay. “Also, I find it strange that the government authorities and the NGO groups working with the government simply ignore a number of peer reviewed papers that document high rates of population decline, forest loss, and killing.”Meijaard and his co-authors cite a number of flaws in the Indonesian government’s methodology for monitoring impacts on orangutan populations and the conclusions drawn from that monitoring. For instance, the government’s assessment relies on nine monitoring sites, including national parks, where a population of 1,153 orangutans was established in 2015. The government estimated that the populations at these nine sites had more than doubled to 2,451 individual orangutans by 2016. The researchers write in the letter, however, that it is “biologically impossible for an orangutan population to double its size in a year.”“It is obvious from the orangutan’s biology that doubling a population in one year, as reported from the monitoring sites, is impossible, and should have alerted the government that something may be wrong about their data,” Meijaard said. “Orangutans are not rabbits.”Orangutans in the wild in Indonesia. Photo Credit: HUTAN-KOCP.Other issues with the Indonesian government’s methodology, Meijaard and colleagues note, include the fact that some of the sampling sites are used for orangutan introductions or translocations, meaning that any increase in the numbers of orangutans at those sites was likely the result of removing animals from a non-monitored population — thus leading to zero net change in the overall numbers of orangutans.Also, the government’s nine sampling sites represent less than 5 percent of the Bornean and Sumatran orangutans’ ranges, and misses the Tapanuli orangutan’s range altogether, the researchers write. They add: “Furthermore, all monitoring sites are within protected areas, whereas the majority of orangutans occur in non-protected lands. It is thus scientifically unjustified to extrapolate population trends from these sampling sites to the total range of all three species.”Mongabay reached out to Indonesia’s Minister of Environment and Forestry as well as other government officials, but requests for comment were declined.There is a solid research base to bolster the Current Biology letter writers’ assertion that all three orangutan species are in fact on the decline. A 2018 study determined that more than 100,000 Bornean orangutans had been lost in the past 16 years, for instance, while a 2017 study found that the Bornean orangutan population has declined by more than 25 percent over the past decade.Meanwhile, the IUCN reports that forest loss data indicate that habitat for both the Sumatran orangutan and the Tapanuli orangutan was reduced by 60 percent between 1985 and 2007. A 2016 study predicted that continued forest loss could result in the loss of as many as 4,500 Sumatran orangutan individuals by 2030.“For the Sumatran orangutan, the population decline is mostly estimated on the basis of forest loss — no forest generally means no orangutans, so that is not something the government can deny,” Meijaard said. “For the third species, the Tapanuli orangutan, the population trends are based on habitat loss estimates and reports of killing.”Poaching and retaliatory killing of orangutans is one of the chief threats the species face, Meijaard added: “Killing is an important factor that drives declines in all three species, especially on Borneo where studies show it to be the biggest driver of population decline.” Yet “Currently orangutan conservation groups (government, NGO, private sector) are not focusing sufficiently on the key threat, which is killing — strategies that reduce killing need to be stepped up.”The Indonesian government is currently in the process of developing a new 10-year action plan for orangutan conservation, and Meijaard said that the government’s assessments of orangutan populations could make a crucial difference in how that plan turns out. “If there was a population increase in the previous 10 years, then the plan can stay the same,” he said. “But if there was a major population decrease, as found by our studies, then a radically different approach to conservation is needed, and the government needs to incorporate these new strategies into their plan.”An orangutan in the wild in Indonesia. Photo Credit: HUTAN-KOCP.CITATIONS• Ancrenaz, M., Gumal, M., Marshall, A.J., Meijaard, E., Wich , S.A. & Husson, S. 2016. Pongo pygmaeus (errata version published in 2018). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T17975A123809220. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-1.RLTS.T17975A17966347.en. Downloaded on 07 November 2018.• Meijaard, E., Sherman, J., Ancrenaz, M., Wich, S. A., Santika, T., & Voigt, M. (2018). Orangutan populations are certainly not increasing in the wild. Current Biology, 28(21). doi:10.1016/j.cub.2018.09.052• Ministry of Environment and Forestry Republic of Indonesia (2018). The State of Indonesia’s Forests 2018. Jakarta: Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Republic of Indonesia.• Nowak, M.G., Rianti, P., Wich , S.A., Meijaard, E. & Fredriksson, G. 2017. Pongo tapanuliensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017: e.T120588639A120588662. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-3.RLTS.T120588639A120588662.en. Downloaded on 07 November 2018.• Santika, T., Ancrenaz, M., Wilson, K. A., Spehar, S., Abram, N., Banes, G. L., … & Erman, A. (2017). First integrative trend analysis for a great ape species in Borneo. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 4839. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-04435-9• Singleton, I., Wich , S.A., Nowak, M., Usher, G. & Utami-Atmoko, S.S. 2017. Pongo abelii (errata version published in 2018). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017: e.T121097935A123797627. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-3.RLTS.T121097935A115575085.en. Downloaded on 07 November 2018.• Voigt, M., Wich, S. A., Ancrenaz, M., Meijaard, E., Abram, N., Banes, G. L., … & Gaveau, D. (2018). Global demand for natural resources eliminated more than 100,000 Bornean orangutans. Current Biology, 28(5). doi:10.1016/j.cub.2018.01.053• Wich, S. A., Singleton, I., Nowak, M. G., Atmoko, S. S. U., Nisam, G., Arif, S. M., … & Gaveau, D. L. (2016). Land-cover changes predict steep declines for the Sumatran orangutan (Pongo abelii). Science Advances, 2(3), e1500789. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1500789Follow Mike Gaworecki on Twitter: @mikeg2001FEEDBACK: Use this form to send a message to the author of this post. If you want to post a public comment, you can do that at the bottom of the page. Article published by Mike Gaworecki Animals, Apes, Borneo Orangutan, Charismatic Animals, Conservation, Critically Endangered Species, Endangered Species, Environment, Great Apes, Mammals, Orangutans, Rainforest Animals, Research, Wildlife, Wildlife Conservation center_img Popular in the CommunitySponsoredSponsoredOrangutan found tortured and decapitated prompts Indonesia probeEMGIES17 Jan, 2018We will never know the full extent of what this poor Orangutan went through before he died, the same must be done to this evil perpetrator(s) they don’t deserve the air that they breathe this has truly upset me and I wonder for the future for these wonderful creatures. So called ‘Mankind’ has a lot to answer for we are the only ones ruining this world I prefer animals to humans any day of the week.What makes community ecotourism succeed? In Madagascar, location, location, locationScissors1dOther countries should also learn and try to incorporateWhy you should care about the current wave of mass extinctions (commentary)Processor1 DecAfter all, there is no infinite anything in the whole galaxy!Infinite stupidity, right here on earth.The wildlife trade threatens people and animals alike (commentary)Anchor3dUnfortunately I feel The Chinese have no compassion for any living animal. They are a cruel country that as we knowneatbeverything that moves and do not humanily kill these poor animals and insects. They have no health and safety on their markets and they then contract these diseases. Maybe its karma maybe they should look at the way they live and stop using animals for all there so called remedies. DisgustingConservationists welcome China’s wildlife trade banThobolo27 JanChina has consistently been the worlds worst, “ Face of Evil “ in regards our planets flora and fauna survival. In some ways, this is nature trying to fight back. This ban is great, but the rest of the world just cannot allow it to be temporary, because history has demonstrated that once this coronavirus passes, they will in all likelihood, simply revert to been the planets worst Ecco Terrorists. Let’s simply not allow this to happen! How and why they have been able to degrade this planets iconic species, rape the planets rivers, oceans and forests, with apparent impunity, is just mind boggling! Please no more.Probing rural poachers in Africa: Why do they poach?Carrot3dOne day I feel like animals will be more scarce, and I agree with one of my friends, they said that poaching will take over the world, but I also hope notUpset about Amazon fires last year? Focus on deforestation this year (commentary)Bullhorn4dLies and more leisSponsoredSponsoredCoke is again the biggest culprit behind plastic waste in the PhilippinesGrapes7 NovOnce again the article blames companies for the actions of individuals. It is individuals that buy these products, it is individuals that dispose of them improperly. If we want to change it, we have to change, not just create bad guys to blame.Brazilian response to Bolsonaro policies and Amazon fires growsCar4 SepThank you for this excellent report. I feel overwhelmed by the ecocidal intent of the Bolsonaro government in the name of ‘developing’ their ‘God-given’ resources.U.S. allocates first of $30M in grants for forest conservation in SumatraPlanet4dcarrot hella thick ;)Melting Arctic sea ice may be altering winds, weather at equator: studyleftylarry30 JanThe Arctic sea ice seems to be recovering this winter as per the last 10-12 years, good news.Malaysia has the world’s highest deforestation rate, reveals Google forest mapBone27 Sep, 2018Who you’re trying to fool with selective data revelation?You can’t hide the truth if you show historical deforestation for all countries, especially in Europe from 1800s to this day. WorldBank has a good wholesome data on this.Mass tree planting along India’s Cauvery River has scientists worriedSurendra Nekkanti23 JanHi Mongabay. Good effort trying to be objective in this article. I would like to give a constructive feedback which could help in clearing things up.1. It is mentioned that planting trees in village common lands will have negative affects socially and ecologically. There is no need to even have to agree or disagree with it, because, you also mentioned the fact that Cauvery Calling aims to plant trees only in the private lands of the farmers. So, plantation in the common lands doesn’t come into the picture.2.I don’t see that the ecologists are totally against this project, but just they they have some concerns, mainly in terms of what species of trees will be planted. And because there was no direct communication between the ecologists and Isha Foundation, it was not possible for them to address the concerns. As you seem to have spoken with an Isha spokesperson, if you could connect the concerned parties, it would be great, because I see that the ecologists are genuinely interested in making sure things are done the right way.May we all come together and make things happen.Rare Amazon bush dogs caught on camera in BoliviaCarrot1 Feba very good iniciative to be fallowed by the ranchers all overSponsoredlast_img read more